Before you book
How to choose a counsellor in BC, and what the letters after the name mean
· 5 min read · Ravi Teja, RCC
In British Columbia, "counsellor" and "therapist" are not restricted titles — anyone may use them. "Registered Clinical Counsellor" is different, and carries a master’s degree, supervised clinical hours, a code of ethics and a complaints process behind it. Here is what to check before you book.
This is the single most useful thing to understand before you start looking, and it is not widely known: in British Columbia the words "counsellor" and "therapist" are not restricted. There is no law stopping anyone from using them. The credential, not the job title, is what tells you what stands behind the person.
The job title on its own guarantees nothing
Regulation of counselling in the province has been under discussion for years and the position may change. As things stand, the meaningful signal is the designation someone holds and the body that granted it, because that is what carries requirements and consequences.
What RCC actually requires
Registered Clinical Counsellor is granted by the BC Association of Clinical Counsellors. It requires master’s level education in counselling or a closely related field, supervised clinical experience, ongoing professional development to stay registered, and adherence to a published code of ethics. The requirements are set out in full on the association’s own site, linked below.
The part that matters most is the last one, and it is the part nobody thinks about while choosing. A designation with a code of ethics behind it has a complaints process attached. If something goes wrong, there is somewhere to take it that is not the counsellor themselves.
Check the register — it takes about a minute
Registrations are searchable. If someone lists a designation, you can confirm it independently rather than taking the website’s word for it, and it is entirely reasonable to do so before handing over money or history. Anyone who would be offended by you checking has told you something useful.
What to ask in a first conversation
- Have you worked with this specific thing before? Not the broad category — the actual situation you are bringing.
- How do you work? A straight answer is a good sign. An answer that is entirely abstract is worth noticing.
- What happens if this turns out not to be a fit? Someone comfortable with that question is someone who has answered it before.
- What are the fees, and what is the cancellation policy? Both should be answerable immediately.
- Can sessions be held in the language I would rather use? Not merely understood in it — actually held in it.
What a long list of approaches is for, and what it is not
A list of modalities tells you what someone is able to draw on. It does not tell you that all of it will be used with you, and a longer list is not evidence of greater depth. The better question is not how many approaches someone knows but which one they would reach for in your situation, and why.
Fit is not a soft consideration
The working relationship between a client and a counsellor is the element most consistently associated with counselling going well, and it is not something you can determine from a website. It is why the first session is also yours to assess, and why concluding after one that the fit is not there is a legitimate outcome rather than a failure.
You are allowed to be a demanding consumer about this. You are choosing who to tell things to, which is a higher bar than choosing a service, and there is no obligation to stay with the first person you meet.
